2026-07-23T23:01:36Zhttps://repisalud.isciii.es/rest/oai/request

oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/168622024-11-28T19:27:04Zcom_20.500.12105_15322com_20.500.12105_2051com_20.500.12105_2052col_20.500.12105_16964col_20.500.12105_16978col_20.500.12105_19618

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Palmar-Santos, Ana María author Oter-Quintana, Cristina author Olmos, Ricardo author Pedraz-Marcos, Azucena author Robledo-Martin, Juana author 2023-09 Aim: To identify the presence of variability in the evaluation of case studies prepared by nursing students during their primary care rotations based on the existing evaluation rubric. To explore the difficulties experienced by link lecturers and students in preparing and evaluating case studies. Design: A mixed methods study. Methods: The scores for the rubric items and the final grades for the case studies were collected from a sample of 132 cases. Qualitative information was collected by conducting open-ended interviews with lecturers and a focus group session with students. Results: Statistically significant differences were identified between the lecturers' mean final grades [F(5.136) = 3.984, p = 0.002] and a variety of items in the evaluation rubric (p < 0.05). In addition, effect sizes [η2 (≈0.14)] of considerable magnitude were found. Two themes emerged from the qualitative data: (1). the challenge of preparing the case studies and (2). the variable nature of the evaluations. Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):6592-6601. 10.1002/nop2.1919 2054-1058 Nursing open 37340631 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/16862 Case study Community placement Evaluation Link lecturer Mixed methods Nursing student Rubric A mixed methods study using case studies prepared by nursing students as a clinical practice evaluation tool