2026-07-21T17:02:23Zhttps://repisalud.isciii.es/rest/oai/request

oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/144192025-05-08T10:12:35Zcom_20.500.12105_2052com_20.500.12105_2051com_20.500.12105_15322col_20.500.12105_19608col_20.500.12105_16959

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel author Petrova, Dafina author Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel author Fernandez-Navarro, Pablo L author Jimenez-Moleon, Jose J. author Sánchez, María-José author 2022-01-13 In the past decade, evidence has accumulated about socio-economic inequalities in very diverse lung cancer outcomes. To better understand the global effects of socio-economic factors in lung cancer, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews. Four databases were searched for systematic reviews reporting on the relationship between measures of socio-economic status (SES) (individual or area-based) and diverse lung cancer outcomes, including epidemiological indicators and diagnosis- and treatment-related variables. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the quality of the selected systematic reviews. Eight systematic reviews based on 220 original studies and 8 different indicators were identified. Compared to people with a high SES, people with a lower SES appear to be more likely to develop and die from lung cancer. People with lower SES also have lower cancer survival, most likely due to the lower likelihood of receiving both traditional and next-generation treatments, higher rates of comorbidities, and the higher likelihood of being admitted as emergency. People with a lower SES are generally not diagnosed at later stages, but this may change after broader implementation of lung cancer screening, as early evidence suggests that there may be socio-economic inequalities in its use. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;14(2):398. 10.3390/cancers14020398 2072-6694 Cancers 35053559 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14419 Diagnosis Disparities Education Income Inequalities Lung cancer Socio-economic Survival Treatment Socio-Economic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews