2024-03-29T13:46:07Zhttp://repisalud.isciii.es/oai/requestoai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/48332023-11-22T12:18:17Zcom_20.500.12105_2053com_20.500.12105_2052com_20.500.12105_2051col_20.500.12105_2054
Repisalud
author
Terán-Hernández, Mónica
author
Ramis, Rebeca
author
Calderón-Hernández, Jaqueline
author
Garrocho-Rangel, Carlos Félix
author
Campos-Alanís, Juan
author
Ávalos-Lozano, José Antonio
author
Aguilar-Robledo, Miguel
2017-09-04T16:31:45Z
2017-09-04T16:31:45Z
2016-09-29
Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):161
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/4833
27681081
10.1186/s12939-016-0448-z
1475-9276
International Journal for Equity in Health
BACKGROUND:
Worldwide, Cervical Cancer (CC) is the fourth most common type of cancer and cause of death in women. It is a significant public health problem, especially in low and middle-income/Gross Domestic Product (GDP) countries. In the past decade, several studies of CC have been published, that identify the main modifiable and non-modifiable CC risk factors for Mexican women. However, there are no studies that attempt to explain the residual spatial variation in CC incidence In Mexico, i.e. spatial variation that cannot be ascribed to known, spatially varying risk factors.
METHODS:
This paper uses a spatial statistical methodology that takes into account spatial variation in socio-economic factors and accessibility to health services, whilst allowing for residual, unexplained spatial variation in risk. To describe residual spatial variations in CC risk, we used generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) with both spatially structured and unstructured random effects, using a Bayesian approach to inference.
RESULTS:
The highest risk is concentrated in the southeast, where the Matlapa and Aquismón municipalities register excessive risk, with posterior probabilities greater than 0.8. The lack of coverage of Cervical Cancer-Screening Programme (CCSP) (RR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.12-1.22), Marginalisation Index (RR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.03-1.08), and lack of accessibility to health services (RR 1.01, 95 % CI 1.00-1.03) were significant covariates.
CONCLUSIONS:
There are substantial differences between municipalities, with high-risk areas mainly in low-resource areas lacking accessibility to health services for CC. Our results clearly indicate the presence of spatial patterns, and the relevance of the spatial analysis for public health intervention. Ignoring the spatial variability means to continue a public policy that does not tackle deficiencies in its national CCSP and to keep disadvantaging and disempowering Mexican women in regard to their health care.
eng
Spatial analysis
Bayesian approach
Cervical cancer
Generalised lineal mixed models
San Luis Potosí
México
Geographic variations in cervical cancer risk in San Luis Potosí state, Mexico: A spatial statistical approach
journal article
URL
https://repisalud.isciii.es/bitstream/20.500.12105/4833/1/GeographicVariationsInCervicalCancer_2016
File
MD5
d46d3d91fb4cb07ba8cfde59f7a7e525
3880884
application/pdf
GeographicVariationsInCervicalCancer_2016
URL
https://repisalud.isciii.es/bitstream/20.500.12105/4833/6/12939_2016_Article_448.pdf.txt
File
MD5
34fc3c928c907d6b85e98c37dea136f0
65091
text/plain
12939_2016_Article_448.pdf.txt
URL
https://repisalud.isciii.es/bitstream/20.500.12105/4833/16/GeographicVariationsInCervicalCancer_2016.txt
File
MD5
34fc3c928c907d6b85e98c37dea136f0
65091
text/plain
GeographicVariationsInCervicalCancer_2016.txt
URL
https://repisalud.isciii.es/bitstream/20.500.12105/4833/22/GeographicVariationsInCervicalCancer_2016.txt
File
MD5
34fc3c928c907d6b85e98c37dea136f0
65091
text/plain
GeographicVariationsInCervicalCancer_2016.txt