Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDondo, Tatendashe B.
dc.contributor.authorHall, Marlous
dc.contributor.authorWest, Robert M.
dc.contributor.authorJernberg, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorLindahl, Bertil
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Hector 
dc.contributor.authorDanchin, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorDeanfield, John E.
dc.contributor.authorHemingway, Harry
dc.contributor.authorFox, Keith A. A.
dc.contributor.authorTimmis, Adam D.
dc.contributor.authorGale, Chris P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-20T10:23:11Z
dc.date.available2017-10-20T10:23:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierISI:000402134700005
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(22):2710-2720
dc.identifier.issn0735-1097
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/5113
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without heart failure (HF), it is unclear if beta-blockers are associated with reduced mortality. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to determine the association between beta-blocker use and mortality in patients with AMI without HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS This cohort study used national English and Welsh registry data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project. A total of 179,810 survivors of hospitalization with AMI without HF or LVSD, between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2013 (final follow-up: December 31, 2013), were assessed. Survival-time inverse probability weighting propensity scores and instrumental variable analyses were used to investigate the association between the use of beta-blockers and 1-year mortality. RESULTS Of 91,895 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 87,915 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 88,542 (96.4\%) and 81,933 (93.2\%) received beta-blockers, respectively. For the entire cohort, with> 163,772 person-years of observation, there were 9,373 deaths (5.2\%). Unadjusted 1-year mortality was lower for patients who received beta-blockers compared with those who did not (4.9\% vs. 11.2\%; p < 0.001). However, after weighting and adjustment, there was no significant difference in mortality between those with and without beta-blocker use (average treatment effect [ATE] coefficient: 0.07; 95\% confidence interval [CI]: -0.60 to 0.75; p = 0.827). Findings were similar for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ATE coefficient: 0.30; 95\% CI: -0.98 to 1.58; p = 0.637) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ATE coefficient: -0.07; 95\% CI: -0.68 to 0.54; p = 0.819). CONCLUSIONS Among survivors of hospitalization with AMI who did not have HF or LVSD as recorded in the hospital, the use of beta-blockers was not associated with a lower risk of death at any time point up to 1 year. (beta-Blocker Use and Mortality in Hospital Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure; (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of all hospitals and health care professions who participate in the MINAP registry. They also acknowledge the MINAP Academic Group and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research for their contribution to this research and to the funders, including the British Health Foundation, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Medical Research Council.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier 
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectaverage treatment effect
dc.subjectNSTEMI
dc.subjectPreserved left ventricular systolic function
dc.subjectPropensity score
dc.subjectSTEMI
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.subjectDISEASE
dc.subjectTRIAL
dc.subjectINTERVENTION
dc.subjectGUIDELINES
dc.subjectMETOPROLOL
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectELEVATION
dc.subjectOUTCOMES
dc.subjectTHERAPY
dc.titleBeta-Blockers and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Heart Failure or Ventricular Dysfunction
dc.typejournal article
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID28571635
dc.format.volume69
dc.format.page2710-2720
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.578
dc.contributor.funderBritish Health Foundation
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Research (Reino Unido) 
dc.contributor.funderMedical Research Council (Reino Unido) 
dc.description.peerreviewed
dc.identifier.e-issn1558-3597
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.578
dc.identifier.journalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
dc.repisalud.orgCNICCNIC::Grupos de investigación::Investigación Cardiovascular Traslacional Multidisciplinaria
dc.repisalud.institucionCNIC
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail
Acceso Abierto

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Atribución 4.0 Internacional