Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14982
Title
Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Author(s)
Merino, Paloma | Guinea, Jesús | Muñoz-Gallego, Irene | González-Donapetry, Patricia | Galán, Juan Carlos | Antona, Nerea | Cilla, Gustavo | Hernáez-Crespo, Silvia | Díaz-de Tuesta, José Luis | Gual-de Torrella, Ana | González-Romo, Fernando | Escribano, Pilar | Sánchez-Castellano, Miguel Ángel | Sota-Busselo, Mercedes | Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto | García, Julio | Cantón, Rafael | Muñoz, Patricia | Folgueira, María Dolores | Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel ISCIII | Oteo-Iglesias, Jesus ISCIII | Spanish Panbio™ COVID-19 validation group
Date issued
2021-02-16
Citation
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb 16;27(5):758-761.
Language
Inglés
Document type
journal article
Abstract
Objetives: The standard RT-PCR assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting testing availability. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (PanbioRT) (Abbott) in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: This prospective multicentre study was carried out in ten Spanish university hospitals and included individuals with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria of COVID-19. Only individuals with ≤7 days from the onset of symptoms or from exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were taken to perform the PanbioRT as a point-of-care test and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. Results: Among the 958 patients studied, 325 (90.5%) had true-positive results. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the PanbioRT were 90.5% (95%CI 87.5-93.6) and 98.8% (95%CI 98-99.7), respectively. Sensitivity in participants who had a threshold cycle (CT) < 25 for the RT-PCR test was 99.5% (95%CI 98.4-100), and in participants with ≤5 days of the clinical course it was 91.8% (95%CI 88.8-94.8). Agreement between techniques was 95.7% (κ score 0.90; 95%CI 0.88-0.93). Conclusions: The PanbioRT performs well clinically, with even more reliable results for patients with a shorter clinical course of the disease or a higher viral load. The results must be interpreted based on the local epidemiological context.
Subject
Antigen diagnosis | Control of cases | COVID-19 | Multicentre evaluation | Pandemic | Quick diagnosis | SARS-CoV2
DOI
Collections
- Investigación > IIS > i+12 - Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid) > IIS - Artículos
- Investigación > IIS > IIS BioDonostia - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia (País Vasco) > IIS - Artículos
- Investigación > IIS > IRYCIS - Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (Madrid) > IIS - Artículos
- Investigación > IIS > IdISSC - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid) > IIS - Artículos
- Investigación > ISCIII > Centro Nacional de Microbiología (CNM) > ISCIII - Artículos