Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Frías, María Luisa 
dc.contributor.authorBermejo-Sanchez, Eva 
dc.contributor.authorCuevas Catalina, María Lourdes 
dc.contributor.authorGrupo Periférico del ECEMC
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-18T11:49:22Z
dc.date.available2022-04-18T11:49:22Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.citationBoletín del ECEMC: Rev Dismor Epidemiol 2010; V (nº 9): 20-42es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0210–3893es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14071
dc.descriptionDismorfología y Genética Clínicaes_ES
dc.description.abstractHere it is presented the analysis of the main clinical aspects of the infants with congenital defects registered by the ECEMC (Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations) between 1980 and 2009. Among a total of 2,561,162 newborns surveyed, 38,503 (1.50%) had congenital defects detected during the fi rst 3 days of life. This group of malformed infants was distributed according to their clinical presentation as isolated (73.98%), multiply malformed (13.51%), and syndromes (12.52%). The etiologic distribution of infants with congenital anomalies in the ECEMC showed a 20.46% of genetic cause, 20.40% multifactorial, 1.33% produced by environmental causes, and the etiology of the defects was unknown in the remaining 57.81%. The secular distribution of the 3 main groups of clinical presentation (isolated, multiply malformed and syndromes) was studied and all of them showed a decreasing trend along the years, probably as a consequence of the impact of the interruption of pregnancy of some affected foetuses. The different types of syndromes identifi ed and their minimal frequency values are also presented, separated by type of cause. Finally, the distribution of cases with birth defects by ethnic groups is also analysed, as well as the proportion of autosomal dominant and recessive syndromes, and also those due to both numerical and structural chromosomal alterations in all the ethnic groups. Due to the small samples in most groups, the differences are not statistically signifi cant, except for autosomal recessive syndromes that are signifi cantly more frequent in Gypsies than in the white groups (both native and foreigner), the black group, and the one of Other (including mix groups).es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherInstituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII). Instituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Raras (IIER)es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.titleAnálisis clínico-epidemiológico de los recién nacidos con defectos congénitos registrados en el ECEMC: Distribución por etiología y por grupos étnicoses_ES
dc.title.alternativeClinical analysis of the newborn infants with congenital defects registered in the ECEMC: Distribution by etiology and ethnic groupses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.format.volumeVes_ES
dc.format.number9es_ES
dc.format.page20-42es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedNoes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://gesdoc.isciii.es/gesdoccontroller?action=download&id=02/08/2012-bde355ff04es_ES
dc.identifier.journalBoletín del ECEMC: Revista de Dismorfología y Epidemiologíaes_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIIIes_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional