ArticleIL-18-induced HIF-1a in ILC3s ameliorates the inflammation of C. rodentium-induced colitisGraphical abstractHighlightsd C. rodentium induces production of IL-18 in colon, which upregulates HIF-1a in ILC3s d IL-18 production in the colon is boosted by TLR2 signaling d HIF-1a promotes IL-22 in ILC3s and not in other innate RORgt+ cells after infection d IL-18 is responsible for the production of IL-22 by colonic ILC3s through HIF-1aValle-Noguera et al., 2023, Cell Reports 42, 113508 December 26, 2023 ª 2023 The Authors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113508Authors Ana Valle-Noguera, Lucı´a Sancho-Temin˜o, Raquel Castillo-Gonza´lez, ..., Jose´ Marı´a Gonza´lez-Granado, Julia´n Aragone´s, Ara´nzazu Cruz-Adalia Correspondence arancruz@ucm.es In brief HIF-1a is a hypoxia-inducible factor regulating several immune cells in the response against infections. Valle- Noguera et al. evaluates the function of HIF-1a in colonic ILC3s during C. rodentium infection in mice, demonstrating that TLR2-induced IL-18 transcriptionally upregulates HIF-1a in ILC3s, boosting IL-22 secretion to protect against the infection.ll OPEN ACCESS llArticle IL-18-induced HIF-1a in ILC3s ameliorates the inflammation of C. rodentium-induced colitis Ana Valle-Noguera,1,8 Lucı´a Sancho-Temin˜o,1,8 Raquel Castillo-Gonza´lez,1,8 Cristina Villa-Go´mez,1 Marı´a Jose´ Gomez-Sa´nchez,1 Anne Ochoa-Ramos,1 Patricia Yag€ue-Ferna´ndez,2 Blanca Soler Palacios,3 Virginia Zorita,4 Berta Raposo-Ponce,5 Jose´ Marı´a Gonza´lez-Granado,1,7 Julia´n Aragone´s,6,7 and Ara´nzazu Cruz-Adalia1,9,* 1Department of Immunology, Ophthalmology and ENT, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigacio´n Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain 2Centro de Investigaciones Biolo´gicas Margarita Salas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain 3Department of Immunology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologı´a, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain 4Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain 5Centro de Biologı´a Molecular Severo Ochoa (CBM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain 6Hospital Santa Cristina, Fundacio´n de Investigacio´n Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain 7CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain 8These authors contributed equally 9Lead contact *Correspondence: arancruz@ucm.es https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113508SUMMARYGroup 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) are vital for defending tissue barriers from invading pathogens. Hypoxia influences the production of intestinal ILC3-derived cytokines by activating HIF. Yet, the mechanisms gov- erning HIF-1a in ILC3s and other innate RORgt+ cells during in vivo infections are poorly understood. In our study, transgenic mice with specific Hif-1a gene inactivation in innate RORgt+ cells (RAG1KO HIF- 1a6Rorc) exhibit more severe colitis following Citrobacter rodentium infection, primarily due to the inability to upregulate IL-22. We find that HIF-1a6Rorc mice have impaired IL-22 production in ILC3s, while non- ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells, also capable of producing IL-22, remain unaffected. Furthermore, we show that IL-18, induced by Toll-like receptor 2, selectively triggers IL-22 in ILC3s by transcriptionally upregulating HIF-1a, revealing an oxygen-independent regulatory pathway. Our results highlight that, during late-stage C. rodentium infection, IL-18 induction in the colon promotes IL-22 through HIF-1a in ILC3s, which is crucial for protection against this pathogen.INTRODUCTION Intestinal disorders such as bacterial infections or autoinflam- matory diseases negatively affect human health. In affluent nations inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) affect over 6 million people, causing significant morbidity in patients. How- ever, in developing countries, enteric bacterial infections, including enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enter- ohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), are a common cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in young children.1,2 The complexity of the molecular mechanisms involved in these af- fections can be studied in vivo with Citrobacter rondentium as a mouse model of gastrointestinal infections, IBD dysbiosis, and even tumorigenesis.3 C. rodentium is a gram-negative mucosal pathogen found naturally in mice; it shares some pathogenic pathways with human EPEC and EHEC infections4 and promotes colonic inflammation and epithelial barrier impairment making it a great model to investigate pathogen- host immune interactions and the pathology of IBDs.5 The complex physiopathology of gastrointestinal disorders in- volves several cell populations and numerous signaling path-C This is an open access article under the CC BY-Nways within the immune response such as interleukin-22 (IL- 22)- and IL-17-expressing CD4+ T cells (Th22 and Th17). Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) constitute one essential innate immune population involved in the response to entero- pathogenic infections and IBD development. This subset be- longs to the innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), recently discovered cells that lack rearranged antigen-specific receptors.6–8 Although ILC3s are not the largest population of ILCs in the colon at steady state, they play significant roles in homeosta- sis and the defense against extracellular pathogens. ILC3s can be subdivided into two subsets defined according to their cell surface expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors, known as NKp46 in mice7–10: NKp46– lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cell-like ILC3s and NKp46+ ILC3s that differ in localiza- tion and function. NKp46– LTi-like ILC3s secrete IL-22 and IL-17, whereas NKp46+ ILC3s primarily produce IL-22, which is involved in the containment of intestinal commensals and the innate response to extracellular bacteria such as C. ron- dentium.11–17 ILC3’s main role in the gut includes maintaining the intestinal barrier integrity and promoting mucosal heal- ing,18 a major clinical endpoint in gastrointestinal disordersell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 ª 2023 The Authors. 1 C-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Figure 1. HIF-1a in immune cells is essential for protection against C. rodentium infection (A) Schematic image of the generation of BM chimeras Ub-Cre ERT2 (WT) or HIF-1afl/fl Ub-Cre (HIF-1a KO) and the experimental procedure of the C. rodentium model. (B) Representative dot plot showing the populations of CD45.1+ and CD45.2+ cells in the peripheral blood of the BM chimeras 4 weeks after BM transplantation. (C) Hif-1a gene expression in the peripheral blood cells of WT and HIF-1a KO BM chimeras. (D) Relative weight of chimeras WT and HIF-1a KO after C. rodentium infection. Representative data of three independent experiments with n = 8. (E) Image of representative colons of non-infected (NI) and infected chimeras WT and HIF-1a KO after 12 days. (F) Colon length of the BM chimeras WT and HIF-1a KO 12 days after C. rodentium infection. (G) CFUs of C. rodentium in the feces of the chimeras WT and HIF-1a KO 2, 5, and 12 days after infection. Data represent the means ± SD from four (F) or three experiments n = 4 (C and G). Statistical analysis: (C) unpaired t test; (D and G) two-way ANOVA; (F) one-way ANOVA with Sidak multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Graphs shows individual data. 2 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 Article ll OPEN ACCESS Figure 2. HIF-1a expressed in RORgt+ cells does not alter the colonic ILC3 percentage and distribution (A) Aggregated UMAP visualization of FlowSOM-generated lymphoid cells (linage–) of multiparametric flow cytometry data from the colon of the HIF-1a6Rorc and the littermate control (WT). ILC1, ILC2, ILC3, and NK subsets correlate with light green, orange, red, and blue clusters, respectively, according to the expression of several markers (RORgt, EOMES, CD127, KLRG1, and GATA3). (legend continued on next page) Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 3 Article ll OPEN ACCESS Article ll OPEN ACCESSproduced by attaching and effacing pathogens and IBDs.5,19 ILC3s and Ltis require RORgt for their generation and func- tion. Recent research has identified additional innate non- ILC3 RORgt+ cells in the gut, which are required for the induc- tion of microbiota-specific T regulatory cell differentiation,20–23 contributing to intestinal homeostasis in steady state. The molecular mechanisms regulating ILC3s during the devel- opment of an infection are currently being investigated. ILC3s can be directly stimulated by cytokines such as IL-23 and IL- 1b or TNF-like ligand 1A (TL1A) during colitis.19,24,25 IL-18 has recently been shown to also play an important role during colitis, secreted by epithelial or innate cells, and necessary for the host defense against C. rodentium.26 In addition, low oxygen levels have been shown to modulate ILC3 response through HIF-1a stabilization.27 To date, there has been no research into whether HIF-1a in colonic ILC3s is involved in the development of colitis induced by C. rodentium, or in relation to what molecular mech- anisms, aside from hypoxia, could be modulating this transcrip- tion factor during an enteric infection. HIF-1a is not exclusively modulated by oxygen levels; it can also be modulated through pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), cytokines, or a combination of factors.28 Herein, we study the role of HIF-1a in colonic ILC3s during the physiological condition and during the C. rodentium infec- tion model, using specific conditional knockout (KO) mice HIF-1afl/flRORgtCre (HIF-1a6Rorc) and RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc. The two types of KO mice presented a more severe C. rodentium-induced colitis than their control. Interestingly, we found that an innate non-ILC3 RORgt+ population secreted IL-22 in the early phase of the infection but that this secretion was independent of HIF-1a expression (day 5). However, the secretion of IL-22 by colonic ILC3s was regulated via HIF-1a at a later stage of infection (day 12). Moreover, we discovered that, while cytokines IL-1b, IL-23, or TL1A were not responsible for the induction of IL-22 through HIF-1a, IL-18 transcriptionally upregulated HIF-1a in ILC3s, thus promoting a significant in- duction of IL-22 inWT ILC3s but not in HIF-1a KO cells. Surpris- ingly, we did not find any difference in the production in vivo of IL-17, neither following C. rodentium infection in the colon of both types of KO mice nor in vitro after the stimulation of HIF- 1a KO and WT ILC3s by IL-18 and IL-23. C. rodentium can be sensed through the Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) by epithelial or innate immune cells, which stimulate the secretion of IL-18, upregulating the expression of HIF-1a in ILC3s and finally acti- vating the production of IL-22. In summary, our findings estab- lish an additional molecular pathway, independent from hypox- ia, which can regulate the secretion of IL-22 by colonic ILC3s through HIF-1a, as a target gene of IL-18 signaling, during C. rodentium infection.(B) Flow cytometry analysis of ILC subsets in the colon from the WT and the HIF (C) Representative images of RORgt+ cells (EGFP, green), CD3 (red), and B220 EGFP+/ and HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/ mice. (D) Representative images of the lamina propria from the colon of WT EGFP+/ an CD3) and the white arrow indicates T cells (CD3+). (E) IL-22 and IL-17 protein secretion by colon explants cultured ex vivo for 24 h. I with n = 5 (B and E). Statistical analysis: (B) two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s mult animals. 4 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023RESULTS The expression of HIF-1a in RORgt+ cells is required for defense against C. rodentium-induced colitis HIF-1a is well documented to be expressed in inflamed mucosa, contributing to intestinal homeostasis primarily through its activa- tion in epithelial cells.29 To investigate the role of HIF-1awithin the immune compartment during enteric bacterial infections, we createdbonemarrow (BM) chimeras, depletingHIF-1a in immune cells using HIF-1afl/fl Ub-Cre ERT2 mice (referred to as HIF-1a KO), where gene depletion was achieved through tamoxifen exposure (Figures 1A–1C). Remarkably, BM HIF-1a KO chimera mice developed worsened C. rodentium colitis, evident in increased weight loss (Figure 1D), greater colon shortening (Figures 1E and 1F), and higher colony-forming units (CFUs) in feces (Figure 1G) compared with control BM Ub-Cre ERT2 (referred to as WT) chimera mice. To explore the specific role of HIF-1a in the innate compartment during colitis, we established mixed BM chimeras by injecting cells from RAG1KO and HIF-1a KOmice (1:1) or RAG1KOandWT control mice (1:1) into recipient mice, thereby re-establishingHIF-1aexpressionexclusively in the innate compartment (Figures S1A and S1B). Significantly, there were no discernible differences in weight loss (Figure S1C), colon shortening (Figure S1D), or CFUs (Figure S1E) between both sets of chimeras. These findings underscore the critical role of HIF-1a expression in the innate compartment for regulating the develop- ment of exacerbated colitis. Given these observations, we sought to investigate the hypothesis that HIF-1a in ILC3 cells plays a pivotal role in the development of C. rodentium-induced colitis. To investigate the role of HIF-1a in ILC3s during C. rodentium- induced colitis, we generated mice with HIF-1a gene deletion in RORgt+ cells, crossing HIF-1afl/fl mice with Rorc promoter- driven Cre recombinase mice (Rorc-Cre). These conditional KO mice (HIF-1a6Rorc) lack the Hif-1a gene in RORgt+ cells, including ILC3s, other innate RORgt+ cells, and T cells express- ing RORgt during their development in double-positive thymo- cytes. We also crossed these mice with RORgt EGFP reporter mice to isolate RORgt-expressing cells for further analysis. Quantitative real-time PCR showed that WT HIF-1afl/fl RORgt EGFP+/ mice (hereinafter WT EGFP+/) expressed more Hif-1a mRNA in RORgt+ cells compared with KO HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/ mice both in the spleen and the lamina propria of the colon (Figures S2A and S2B). We conducted comprehensive high-dimensional analysis (Figures 2A and S2C) and gating strategies (Figure S2D) to confirm that HIF-1a6Rorc mice did not exhibit differences in the percentage of colonic ILCs under steady-state conditions (Figure 2B). We also considered the presence of other non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells,20–23 which share similarities with myeloid cells, expressing RORgt but not-1a6Rorc. (cyan) immunostaining on colon tissues showing lymphoid follicles from WT d the HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/. Orange arrows show innate RORgt+ cells (EGFP+ ndividuals/means ± SD for each sample from three independent experiments, iple comparisons; (E) unpaired t test. *p < 0.05. Symbols represent individual (legend on next page) Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 5 Article ll OPEN ACCESS Article ll OPEN ACCESSCXCR6, IL-7R, or CD90 (Figure S2E). This analysis revealed no differences in the cell number of this population between the two strains (Figure S2F). In addition, the absolute numbers of various RORgt-expressing populations in the spleenwere similar in HIF-1a6Rorc and control mice (Figure S2G). Confocal micro- scopy analysis demonstrated a comparable distribution of colonic CD3RORgt+ cells in both transgenic mice within lymphoid follicles (Figure 2C) and the lamina propria of the colon (Figure 2D). However, a significant increase in IL-22 protein induction was observed in the colons of HIF-1a6Rorc mice compared with control mice, although no difference was de- tected in IL-17 levels (Figure 2E). Furthermore, histological anal- ysis of the colon in these conditional mice did not reveal any signs of pathology in the baseline condition (Figures S3A and S3B). To assess colitis development in these conditional mice following infection, we employed the C. rodentium colitis model, which relies on ILC3s during the acute phase.30 Surprisingly, HIF-1a6Rorc mice displayed more severe colitis compared with their controls. Despite having elevated baseline IL-22 levels in the colon (Figure 2E), thesemice exhibited increasedCFUs in their feces (Figure 3A) and more pronounced colon inflammation, as assessed by histoscore and flow cytometry (Figures 3B–3D). However, no significant difference was observed in terms of weight loss (Figure S3C). Of significance, a notable reduction in IL-22 protein induction was observed in the colons of HIF- 1a6Rorc mice 12 days post-infection in contrast to the control mice (Figure 3E), potentially explaining the increased disease severity in HIF-1a-deficient mice. Conversely, other cytokines such as IL-17 (Figures 3F and 3G) remained unaffected in these conditional mice. There were no significant alterations in the mRNA expression of Il-1b, Il-23p19, and Tnf-a (Figure 3G). Con- cerning the formation and maintenance of lymphoid structures, the number of colonic patches in both non-infected and C. rodentium-infected colons was unaltered in HIF-1a6Rorc compared with control mice (Figure S3D). Furthermore, no differ- ences were observed in the localization of ILC3s within colon lymphoid follicles after 12 days of infection (Figure S3E). Deficiency of HIF-1a in innate RORgt+ cells impairs IL-22 induction during C. rodentium infection, exacerbating colitis To further evaluate the in vivo impact of HIF-1a specifically ex- pressed in innate RORgt+ cells in the C. rodentium-colitis model, wecrossed theHIF-1a6Rorcmicewith theRAG1KOmice toobtain RAG1KOHIF-1a6Rorc mice to eliminate any possible contribution by HIF-1a in T cells. We observed no differences either in the per- centage of colonic ILCs (Figure S4A) or in histology analysis inFigure 3. HIF-1a, expressed in RORgt+ cells, is important for protectio (A) CFUs of C. rodentium in feces from the HIF-1a6Rorc and the littermate contro (B) Histoscore of the colitis in HIF-1a6Rorc and WT mice 12 days after C. rodenti (C) Representative image of H&E staining on colon tissues from an infected WT (D) Absolute number of CD45+ cells isolated from the lamina propria of the colon (E and F) IL-22 and IL-17 protein secretion by colon explants from C. rodentium- (G) mRNA relative expression of several cytokine genes in the colon from HIF-1 represent the means ± SD from three independent experiments with n = 5/6. Statis Mann-Whitney U test; (D–F) unpaired t test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. S 6 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice compared with the littermate control RAG1KOWTmice in steady state (Figures S4B and S4C). Subse- quently,weevaluated the impactofdeficientexpressionofHIF-1a in ILC3s in the C. rodentium-colitis model, observing that the RAG1KOHIF-1a6Rorc exhibited lowersurvival rate than their litter- mate controls (Figure 4A) as well as a significantly greater weight loss (Figure 4B). Interestingly, we observed that the CFUs in the feces of the RAG1KOHIF-1a6Rorc mice showed a declining trend in the first few days of infection, but that effect subsequently became inverted (Figure 4C). Indeed, when we measured IL-22 expression in the colon, a trend of more protein levels was de- tected in the colon of the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice compared with the control under physiological conditions (Figure 4D), which explained the decrease in CFUs observed in the RAG1KO HIF- 1a6Rorc mice the first days of infection. However, induction of IL-22 12 days after C. rodentium infection became impaired in these deficient mice (Figure 4D), with results similar to those observed in theHIF-1a6Rorcmice (Figure3E).Moreover, histology score clearly showed that the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice devel- oped more severe inflammation in the colon than the control mice (Figures 4E and 4F). In combination, these experiments demonstrate a key role of cell-intrinsic HIF-1a in regulating the production of IL-22 by colonic innate RORgt+ cells, thus prevent- ing a more severe colitis. HIF-1a regulates the production of IL-22 in ILC3s after C. rodentium infection To ascertain whether the impaired induction of IL-22 in this colitis model was a consequence of the deletion of HIF-1a in the ILC3s or in other RORgt+ cells, we assessed in which cell types IL-22 was affected in the HIF-1a6Rorc mice after 2, 5, and 12 days of infection. On day 2, there was a notable increase in IL-22+ cells in Lin-CD3RORgt+ NKp46– IL-7R+ CXCR6+ CD90+/ popula- tions (which include Lti and ILC3 NKp46) in the colon of HIF- 1a6Rorc mice. In addition, the CD3 RORgt+ IL-7R CXCR6– CD90 subpopulation (referred to as non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells) also showed IL-22 production after 2 days of infection (Figure 5A). No significant differences were observed in the cell counts for ILC3s or the non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells between WT and HIF-1a6Rorc mice (Figure 5B). On day 5 of infection, no difference was observed in the percentage of any ILC3 and Lti IL-22+ subpopulations (Figure 5C). Regarding the non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells, these produced high levels of IL-22 5 days after infection, but no difference was detected between the HIF-1a6Rorc and WT mice (Figure 5C). As we observed in the IL-17 production by colon explants, the percentage of IL- 17-positive cells in the ILC3s was similar in these transgenic mice (Figure S4D). Unlike IL-22 (Figure 5C), the non-ILC3 innaten against C. rodentium infection l mice (WT) after infection. um infection. and HIF-1a6Rorc mouse stained with H&E. from the HIF-1a6Rorc and WT mice 5 days after C. rodentium infection. infected HIF-1a6Rorc and WT mice on day 12. a6Rorc and WT mice non-infected (NI) and 12 days after infection. The data tical analysis: (A and G) two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparison test; (B) ymbols represent individual animals. Figure 4. HIF-1a expressed in ILC3 RORgt+ cells protects against severe colitis induced by C. rodentium (A) Survival rate of RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT control mice after C. rodentium inoculation, n = 7. (B) Relative weight of RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice after C. rodentium infection. (C) CFUs of C. rodentium in the feces from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice after infection. (D) IL-22 protein quantification secreted by colon explant from non-infected (NI) or infected RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice cultured for 48 h. (legend continued on next page) Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 7 Article ll OPEN ACCESS Article ll OPEN ACCESSRORgt+ exhibited no intracellular staining in IL-17. No difference was detected in the absolute number of the different cell subsets on day 5 (Figure 5D). On day 12 of infection, we detected a sig- nificant decrease in the percentage of IL-22+ in the Lti and ILC3 subsets (including NKp46 and NKp46+ ILC3 cells) in the colon of the HIF-1a6Rorc mice compared with the control mice, but not in the non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ IL-22+ cells (Figure 5E). How- ever, no difference was observed in the cell number of the different innate subsets between the WT and HIF-1a6Rorc mice (Figure 5F), suggesting that deficiency of HIF-1a inhibited pro- duction of IL-22, as opposed to the expansion or survival of the ILC3s. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the percentage of IL-22+ within the Lti/ILC3 NKp46 and ILC3 NKp46+ in the co- lon of the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice was also observed compared with the control mice (Figure 5G). No significant vari- ance was observed in the absolute cell count among the various innate subsets on day 12 (Figure 5H). Therefore, the lack of HIF-1a impairs the production of IL-22 by ILC3s following C. rodentium infection. For a detailed investigation of specific ILC3 and ILC1 popula- tions, we performed flow cytometry analysis on RAG1KO HIF- 1a6Rorc and control mice on day 12 post-infection. Interestingly, we foundahigher percentageof ILC3NKp46 subset inRAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice compared with WT mice, despite observing a lower proportion of IL-22+ ILC3s, suggesting apotential compen- satory mechanism (Figure S4E). However, there were no observed differences in absolute cell numbers (Figure S4F). Furthermore, the decreased IL-22 production by HIF-1a-defi- cient ILC3s on day 12 post-infection (Figures 5E and 5G) poten- tially being attributed to the increased bacterial load and height- ened inflammation observed in these transgenic mice was addressed. To eliminate the influence of such environmental sec- ondary factors, IL-22 production was evaluated in colonic ILC3s in response to C. rodentium infection in a mixed BM chimera, where both WT and HIF-1a-deficient ILC3s coexist within the same mouse environment. To achieve this, BM from CD45.2 HIF-1a6Rorc mice and their CD45.1 WT littermate controls were transferred into B6 recipient mice. After 12 days of infection, IL- 22 was analyzed in the ILC3 CD45.1 WT or ILC3 CD45.2 HIF- 1a6Rorc from the colon by flow cytometry, showing that the percentage of IL-22+ cells in ILC3 CD45.2 HIF-1a6Rorc was significantly lower compared with ILC3 CD45.1WT (Figure S4G). HIF-1a controls the secretion of IL-22 by ILC3s in response to TLR2 agonist as well as cytokine IL-18 To establish the molecular mechanisms involved in the induc- tion of IL-22 through HIF-1a, we incubated colon explants from the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice and the littermate controls with different signals produced by C. rodentium infection. As these bacteria are Gram-negative, the innate receptor for bac- terial lipopolysaccharide TLR4 could be contributing to the host response.31 Moreover, TLR2 has been shown to play a critical(E) Representative images of H&E staining on colon tissues from RAG1KO HIF-1 (F) Histological score of the colitis inflammation from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and means ± SD from three independent experiments with n = 7mice (C and D); from tw (Mantel-Cox) test; (B–D) two-way ANOVA with Sidak multiple comparisons; (F) animals. 8 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023role in maintaining intestinal mucosal integrity during C. roden- tium infection.32 In view of this, we incubated colon explants in vitro with LPS (TLR4 agonist) or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2 agonist) for 48 h and IL-22 was then quantified by ELISA. Although IL- 22 protein levels did not increase in the supernatant of colon explants from the RAG1KO WT mice stimulated with LPS (Fig- ure 6A), we could detect more IL-22 levels when we stimulated them with Pam3CSK4 and IL-2 (Figure 6B); on the contrary, this enhancement was not observed in stimulated colon explants from the RAG1KOHIF-1a6Rorc mice (Figure 6B), demonstrating that HIF-1a is critical for the induction of IL-22 in ILC3s by TLR2 signaling. Since murine ILC3s do not express TLR2,33 TLR- induced cytokines were explored as possible activators of HIF-1a-dependent IL-22 production. IL-1b or TL1A combined with IL-23 upregulated IL-22 production in colon explants from both the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and the WT mice (Figures 6C and 6D), suggesting that HIF-1a was not involved in the in- duction of IL-22 by ILC3s via these cytokines. However, although IL-18 alone or with IL-23 promoted the secretion of IL-22 by ILC3s from colon explants of the RAG1KO WT mice, this induction was not observed in the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice, indicating that IL-18 promoted the secretion of IL-22 through HIF-1a in ILC3s (Figures 6E and 6F). IL-23, TL1A, and IL-2 alone were unable to induce a significant increase in IL- 22 when incubated with colon explants from the RAG1KO WT or the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice (Figures S5A‒S5C). C. rodentium transcriptionally upregulates HIF-1a in colonic ILC3s to stimulate the production of IL-22 activated by TLR2-induced IL-18 To demonstrate that C. rodentium can transcriptionally upregu- late HIF-1a and IL-18 in the colon in vivo, WT mice were orally infected, and colon RNA was isolated at different time points during the infection forHif-1a and Il-18 expression quantification. Hif-1amRNA tended to increase over time, with significant upre- gulation in the colon of infected WT mice at day 12 compared with uninfected ones (Figure 7A). This increase in Hif-1a was also observed in sorted colonic ILC3s from WT mice after 12 days of infection, demonstrating transcriptional regulation of HIF-1a in this colonic cell population (Figure 7B). Furthermore, IL-18 was upregulated in the colon of WT mice infected with C. rodentium, showing a significant increase after 7 days and maintained up to day 12 of infection (Figure 7C). TLR2 signaling’s requirement for IL-18 induction was demonstrated by incubating colon explants fromWTmice ex vivowith a TLR2 agonist; this led to the production of IL-18 (Figure 7D). An antagonist of IL-18 (IL- 18 binding protein; BP IL-18) importantly inhibited IL-22 produc- tion induced by TLR2 in colon explants from RAG1KO WT mice, indicating that IL-18, produced upon TLR2 activation, was responsible for inducing IL-22 in colonic ILC3s (Figure 7E). Significantly, Hif-1a mRNA was upregulated in isolated ILC3s from the spleens of WT EGFP+/ control mice when stimulateda6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice on day 12 after C. rodentium infection. RAG1KO WT mice 12 days after C. rodentium infection. The data represent o independent experiments with n = 8mice (F). Statistical analysis: (A) log rank Mann-Whitney U test. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. Symbols represent individual (legend on next page) Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 9 Article ll OPEN ACCESS Article ll OPEN ACCESSin vitro with IL-18 and IL-23 compared with non-stimulated cells (Figure 7F). In addition, the mRNA of glucose transporter 1 (Slc2a1), one of the key genes regulated by HIF-1a, was signifi- cantly upregulated in these IL-18- and IL-23-stimulated cells (Figure 7G). Importantly, IL-18 alone induced the upregulation of Hif-1a in these sorted cells (Figure 7H). Indeed, ILC3s from the spleen of WT EGFP+/ mice significantly upregulated Il-22 mRNA when stimulated with IL-18 and IL-23 compared with non-stimulated cells. However, this response was not observed in the ILC3s from KO HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/ mice (Figure 7I). Notably, there was no difference in Il-17 mRNA expression in sorted ILC3s from KO HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/ mice compared with WT mice when stimulated with IL-18 and IL-23 (Figure 7J). To confirm that IL-22 induction was specific to colonic ILC3s, lamina propria cells from the colon of WT mice were incubated with no stimulus, IL-18 alone, or IL-18 plus IL-23, followed by flow cytometry analysis of intracellular cytokines. ILC3 WT cells significantly upregulated IL-22 after IL-18 induction and even more with IL-18 plus IL-23 (Figure 7K). In contrast, the non- ILC3 innate RORgt+ population did not upregulate IL-22 after IL-18 or IL-18 plus IL-23 stimulation in vitro (Figure 7K). These findings demonstrate that HIF-1a is transcriptionally upregulated in colonic ILC3s following C. rodentium infection, inducing IL-22 production while not affecting IL-17 in ILC3s via TLR2-induced IL-18. DISCUSSION Our research uncovers a pathway for IL-22 production by colonic ILC3s during acute C. rodentium-induced colitis. This pathway involves IL-18 upregulation in the colon due to enteric pathogen infection, promoting IL-22 production by colonic ILC3s through HIF-1a. Previously, mTOR1 inhibition (Rptor6Rorc mice, KO of Raptor in the RORgt+ cells) was shown to reduce ILC3 numbers in the small intestine,34,35 affecting their response to C. rodentium infection in the colon, although colonic ILC3 numbers remained unaffected, suggesting other mechanisms at play.34 Hypoxia boosts ILC3 activation and proliferation, notably observed in the MNK3 cell line.27 In HIF-1a-deficient RORgt mice, small intestine ILC3 numbers decreased, while ILC1 numbers increased, preserving the RORgt-ILC3 profile.27 Strikingly, these mice were more susceptible to Clostridium difficile, although ILC3s were thought to have a minor role, whereas loss of ILC1s increased susceptibility.36 Indeed, IL- 17-producing gd T cells, also expressing RORgt, contribute to C. difficile protection37; consequently, the role of HIF-1a in RORgt+ cells in C. difficile susceptibility may involve gd T cellsFigure 5. Deficiency of HIF-1a impairs the production of IL-22 by ILC3 (A and B) Representative flow cytometry dot plots and the percentage of IL-22+ c ILC3 Nkp46+, the non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells IL-17R, CXCR6, CD90) or abs the HIF-1a6Rorc and control mice (WT) 2 days after C. rodentium infection. (C and D) Percentage of IL-22+ cells (C) in the different cell populations or absolu (E and F) Percentage of IL-22+ cells (E) in the different subsets or absolute numb (G and H) Percentage of IL-22+ cells (G) in the different populations or absolute nu control mice RAG1KOWT after 12 daysC. rodentium infection. Data represent me Statistical analysis: (A, C, E, and G) unpaired t test; (B, D, F, and H) two-way ****p<0,0001. Symbols represent individual animals. 10 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023but requires further investigation. Unlike the HIF-1a-deficient RORgt mice, the loss of HIF-1a, in Nkp46+ cells, prevents ILC3-to-ILC1 conversion, protecting against dextran sodium sul- fate colitis-induced intestinal damage.38 Herein, we generated transgenic HIF-1a6Rorc mice as an approach for studying the in vivo contribution of HIF-1a in RORgt+ cells in the colon. The colonic ILC populations remained stable in steady state, contrasting prior findings in RAG2KO RptorDRorc mice.34 Intriguingly, the absence of Hif-1a boosted IL-22 production by ILC3s under steady-state conditions. How- ever, upon C. rodentium infection, HIF-1a6Rorc mice exhibited increased susceptibility, likely due to inadequate IL-22 upregula- tion after 12 days, leading to higher bacterial load and epithelial damage. Surprisingly, IL-17 levels resembled those in WT mice. Similarly, in RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice, IL-22 secretion was dysregulated 12 days after C. rodentium-induced colitis onset. This resulted in increased susceptibility and severe disease, highlighting the impact of HIF-1a deficiency in innate RORgt+ cells, encompassing ILC3s or other non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ populations. Cytometry analysis revealed that HIF-1a deficiency hindered IL-22 production by ILC3s after 12 days of infection, while other innate RORgt+ cells surprisingly produced IL-22 early during C. rodentium infection. Hence, these findings suggest a dual role for HIF-1a in colonic ILC3s, potentially suppressing basal IL-22 production during steady-state conditions and stimulating it during late-stage bacterial infection. Under basal conditions, microbiota-produced butyrate stimulates IL-22 in CD4+ T cells and ILC3s by increasing mTOR, STAT3, AhR, and HIF-1a levels.35 The findings contradict expectations for HIF- 1a6Rorc mice, suggesting that HIF-1a may counteract basal IL- 22 secretion in ILC3s through other pathways, for example, involving RANK, VIPR2, or RET.15,39–44 Further studies are needed for confirmation. In the late infection stage, we found that HIF-1a regulates IL-22 secretion in colonic ILC3s via IL-18, demonstrated through ex vivo experiments using RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice and their controls. Curiously, previous research showed IL-18-induced HIF-1a in vitro in a mouse melanoma cell line.45 Our study confirms this connection specifically in ILC3s, whereC. rodentium infection up- regulates HIF-1a in colonic tissue and ILC3s, especially when exposed to IL-18 or IL-18 with IL-23. Remarkably, HIF-1a and IL-22 mRNA upregulation in ILC3s occurs after 6 h, indicating direct binding to the IL-22 promoter, similar to CD4+ T cells.46 This suggests that HIF-1a in ILC3s is regulated by both post- translational changes from hypoxia and an O2-independent mechanism, as seen in monocytes stimulated with LPS.47 More- over, IL-18 was upregulated in C. rodentium-infected mice, ands ells (A) in the different innate subsets expressing RORgt (Lti and ILC3 Nkp46, olute numbers (B) detected in isolated colonic lamina propria cells (LPCs) from te numbers (D) after 5 days of C. rodentium infection. ers (F) 12 days after C. rodentium infection. mbers (H) in isolated colonic LPC cells from the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and the ans ± SD from one representative of three independent experiments with n = 5. ANOVA with Sidak multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p<0.001, Figure 6. ILC3s release IL-22 in response to TLR2 agonist or IL-18 through HIF-1a (A) IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants fromRAG1KOHIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KOWT control mice incubated ex vivowith TLR4 agonist for 48 h andwith non- stimulus (NS). (B) IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice stimulated ex vivo with TLR2 agonist and IL-2 for 48 h. (C) IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice incubated ex vivo with IL-1b and IL-23 for 48 h. (D) IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice incubated ex vivo with TL1A and IL-23 for 48 h. (E) IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice ex vivo stimulated with IL-18 for 48 h. (F) IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc and RAG1KO WT mice incubated ex vivo with IL-18 and IL-23 for 48 h. Data repre- sentation from three independent experiments with minimum n = 5. Statistical analysis: paired t test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Symbols represent individual data from one animal with and without stimulus. Article ll OPEN ACCESSit increased IL-22 in WT ILC3s but not in HIF-1a KO ILC3s, while no difference was observed in the upregulation of IL-17, thus demonstrating an independent regulation of both cytokines in this infection model. The highest IL-22 peak occurred on day 12, after the IL-18 peak, indicating the role of IL-18 in IL-22 pro- duction in ILC3s. Similar findings were observed during Toxo- plasma gondii infection in the ileum.48 Moreover, another study found that human ILC3 proliferation and IL-22 secretion are IL- 18 dependent via NF-kB in human tonsils.49 Since TLR2 plays an essential role in maintaining mucosal integrity during C. rodentium-induced colitis32 and C. rodentium can activate TLR4 in host cells,31,50 we studied whether theactivation of both receptors could induce IL-22 by ILC3s through HIF-1a in colon explants. Our results showed that a TLR2 agonist with IL-2 significantly boosted IL-22 secretion in colon explants from RAG1KO WT mice but not in those from RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice, suggesting that TLR2 signaling via HIF-1a trig- gers IL-22 production by ILC3s. Sincemouse ILC3s typically lack TLR2 and direct regulation by its ligands,33 we ruled out direct TLR2 modulation of ILC3s. TLR2 can be expressed by innate and epithelial cells51 and their activation is associated with IL-18 production.26,52,53 A defective IL-18 production in IL-18/ mice causes greater susceptibility to C. rodentium infection.54 During bacterial infections and PAMPs exposure, intestinal epithelialCell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 11 (legend on next page) 12 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 Article ll OPEN ACCESS Article ll OPEN ACCESScells activate inflammasomes, releasing IL-18.55 TLR2stimulation induces proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-18, in human dendritic cells.53 Our findings indicated that a TLR2 agonist notably promoted IL-18 secretion in colon explants from WT mice. Importantly, an IL-18 antagonist inhibited TLR2-induced IL-22 production in ex vivo colon explants from RAG1KO WT mice, suggesting that TLR2-induced IL-18 secretion drives IL- 22 production by ILC3s. However, further research is needed to identify the primary source of IL-18 following C. rodentium infec- tion in TLR2-dependent signaling. In summary,wehave elucidated amolecular pathway involving TLR2-triggered IL-18 release that transcriptionally regulates HIF- 1a expression and IL-22 secretion by ILC3s in the colon during late-stage C. rodentium infection. In addition, we observed IL- 22 secretion by non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells, which, in this context, is independent of HIF-1a expression. These findings hold promise for advancing research in colitis, enteropathogen infections, IBDs, and cancer progression. Limitations of the study Regrettably, this study could not ascertain the production of IL- 22 in the different subsets of sorted RORgt+ cells from the colon of infected mice, primarily due to technical intricacies. Interest- ingly, further exploration is needed to analyze the role of the characterized non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ cells in the control of the C. rodentium infection. STAR+METHODS Detailed methods are provided in the online version of this paper and include the following: d KEY RESOURCES TABLE d RESOURCE AVAILABILITYFig pro (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) IL-1 (F a (H) (I a and (K) wit rep and **pB Lead contact B Materials availability B Data and code availability d EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DE- TAILS B Mice B BM chimeras B Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitisure 7. C. rodentium infection causes TLR2-induced IL-18 producti moting IL-22 expression Gene expression of Hif-1a in the colon from uninfected and infected WT mice Hif-1a relative expression in sorted ILC3s from WT mice non-infected (NI) an IL-18 protein secretion by colon explants from the uninfected and C. rodentiu IL-18 protein secretion by colon explants from WT mice incubated ex vivo wi IL-22 protein secretion by colon explants from RAG1KO WT mice incubated f 8 (S + BP IL-18). nd G) Gene expression ofHif-1a (F) or Slc2a1 (G) in sorted ILC3s from the splee Gene expression of Hif-1a in sorted splenic ILC3s of WT EGFP+/ ex vivo inc nd J) Gene expression of Il-22 (I) or Il-17 (J) in sorted splenic ILC3s of the WT E IL-23 for 6 h. The levels of mRNA are normalized to the stimulated WT. Percentage of IL-22+ cells in ILC3s or in the non-ILC3 innate RORgt+ subsets h IL-18 or IL-18 plus IL-23 overnight, quantified by flow cytometry. Statistically resent the means ± SD from three (A, B, and H–J), two (C, K, and L), or four (D F–H) paired t test; (E, K, and L) RM one-way ANOVA test; (C, I, and J) one- < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.d METHOD DETAILS B Counting of colonic patches B Isolation of colonic LPCs B Flow cytometry, antibodies, and ELISA B Flow cytometry gating strategy B Ex vivo organ culture B Isolation of splenic ILC3s B Histology B Immunofluorescence B RNA isolation and qPCR d QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j. celrep.2023.113508. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the Flow Cytometry Core Facility of the CBMSO and the CIB, the Histology and Microscopy Facilities of CNB, and the Genomic Fa- cility ofCAI atUCMand ‘‘ParqueCientı´fico deMadrid’’ for the technical support provided. The graphical abstract was created using Biorender software. The present research was supported by the ‘‘Ramon y Cajal’’ Program (RYC- 2017-21837), the grant nos. RTI2018-093647-B-I00, CNS2022-135365, and PID2021-122780OB-I00 awarded to A.C.-A. by the ‘‘Ministerio de Ciencia e In- novacio´n’’, Agencia Estatal de Investigacio´n (AEI). JMGG’s laboratory is sup- ported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (PI20/00306). All these grants were co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) ‘‘A way to build Europe’’. A.V.-N. is a recipient of an FPI fellowship (PRE2019-090341) from the ‘‘Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´n.’’ R.C.-G. is a recipient of a Juan de la Cierva grant (FJC2021-047282-I) from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´n. C.V.-G. is supported by ‘‘Programa Investigo Comu- nidad de Madrid’’ (09-PIN1-00009.8/2022) and L.S.-T. is supported by the PID2021-122780OB-I00 project by the ‘‘Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´n.’’ Currently, L.S.-T. has been awarded an FPU grant (FPU22/02155) from the ‘‘Ministerio de Educacio´n y Formacio´n Profesional.’’ AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS A.V.-N. performed and analyzed most of the experiments and helped to draft the manuscript. M.J.G.-S. performed experiments and analyzed some of the data. L.S.-T., C.V.-G., and R.C.-G. performed experiments, designed the fig- ures, and revised the manuscript. A.O.-R. performed some of the colon explant experiments. B.S.P. analyzed the localization of ILCs by means of a confocal analysis. V.Z. performed the experiments of the BM chimeras.on in the colon, which transcriptionally upregulates Hif-1a in ILC3s, after 3, 7, and 12 days. d after 12 days infection. m-infected WT mice after 3, 5, 7, and 12 days. th IL-2 and TLR2 agonist (Pam3CSK4) for 24 h and with non-stimulus (NS). or 48 h ex vivo with Pam3CSK4 and IL-2 (S, stimulus) and blocked with the BP n ofWT EGFP+/mice incubated ex vivowith or without IL-18 and IL-23 for 6 h. ubated with or without IL-18 for 6 h. GFP+/ and HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/mice incubated ex vivo with or without IL-18 of LPCs from HIF-1a6Rorc or WT mice, unstimulated (NS) or incubated ex vivo significant when comparing unstimulated ILC3 WT cells with stimulation. Data –G) independent experiments. Statistical analysis: (A and B) unpaired t test; (D way ANOVA with Sidak multiple comparisons. n.s., not significant; *p < 0.05, Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 13 Article ll OPEN ACCESSB.R.-P. analyzed the ILC populations in the colon using the dimensionality reduction algorithm and assisted in themulti-parameter setting. P.Y.-F. helped in the sorting of ILC3s and the multiparametric analysis using the Cytoflex cy- tometer. J.M.G.-G. provided some protocols, expertise, and reagents. J.A. provided the HIF-1afl/fl Ub-Cre ERT2 mice for the BM chimera experiments and reviewed themanuscript. A.C.-A. conceptualized the study, designed, su- pervised, analyzed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. Received: April 18, 2023 Revised: October 24, 2023 Accepted: November 13, 2023 Published: November 28, 2023 REFERENCES 1. Petri, W.A., Miller, M., Binder, H.J., Levine,M.M., Dillingham, R., andGuer- rant, R.L. (2008). Enteric infections, diarrhea, and their impact on function and development. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1277–1290. 2. Croxen, M.A., Law, R.J., Scholz, R., Keeney, K.M., Wlodarska, M., and Finlay, B.B. (2013). Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 822–880. 3. Bouladoux, N., Harrison, O.J., and Belkaid, Y. (2017). TheMouseModel of Infection with Citrobacter rodentium. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 119, 19. 4. Collins, J.W., Keeney, K.M., Crepin, V.F., Rathinam, V.A.K., Fitzgerald, K.A., Finlay, B.B., and Frankel, G. (2014). Citrobacter rodentium: Infection, inflammation and the microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 612–623. 5. Mundy, R., MacDonald, T.T., Dougan, G., Frankel, G., andWiles, S. (2005). Citrobacter rodentium of mice and man. Cell Microbiol. 7, 1697–1706. 6. Cruz-Adalia, A., and Veiga, E. (2016). Close encounters of lymphoid cells and bacteria. Front. Immunol. 7, 405. 7. Vivier, E., Artis, D., Colonna, M., Diefenbach, A., di Santo, J.P., Eberl, G., Koyasu, S., Locksley, R.M., McKenzie, A.N.J., Mebius, R.E., et al. (2018). Innate Lymphoid Cells: 10 Years On. Cell 174, 1054–1066. 8. Domingues, R.G., and Hepworth, M.R. (2020). Immunoregulatory Sensory Circuits in Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cell (ILC3) Function and Tissue Ho- meostasis. Front. Immunol. 11, 116. 9. Eberl,G.,Marmon,S., Sunshine,M.-J., Rennert, P.D.,Choi, Y., andLittman, D.R. (2004). An essential function for the nuclear receptor RORgt in the gen- eration of fetal lymphoid tissue inducer cells. Nat. Immunol. 5, 64–73. 10. Luci, C., Reynders, A., Ivanov, I.I., Cognet, C., Chiche, L., Chasson, L., Hardwigsen, J., Anguiano, E., Banchereau, J., Chaussabel, D., et al. (2009). Influence of the transcription factor RORgt on the development of NKp46+ cell populations in gut and skin. Nat. Immunol. 10, 75–82. 11. Satoh-Takayama, N., Vosshenrich, C.A.J., Lesjean-Pottier, S., Sawa, S., Lochner, M., Rattis, F., Mention, J.-J., Thiam, K., Cerf-Bensussan, N., Mandelboim, O., et al. (2008). Microbial Flora Drives Interleukin 22 Produc- tion in Intestinal NKp46+ Cells that Provide Innate Mucosal Immune De- fense. Immunity 29, 958–970. 12. Sonnenberg, G.F., Monticelli, L.A., Elloso, M.M., Fouser, L.A., and Artis, D. (2011). CD4(+) lymphoid tissue-inducer cells promote innate immunity in the gut. Immunity 34, 122–134. 13. Qiu, J., Heller, J.J., Guo, X., Chen, Z.M.E., Fish, K., Fu, Y.X., and Zhou, L. (2012). The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Regulates Gut Immunity through Modulation of Innate Lymphoid Cells. Immunity 36, 92–104. 14. Guo, X., Qiu, J., Tu, T., Yang, X., Deng, L., Anders, R.A., Zhou, L., and Fu, Y.X. (2014). Induction of innate lymphoid cell-derived interleukin-22 by the transcription factor STAT3mediates protection against intestinal infection. Immunity 40, 25–39.14 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 202315. Valle-Noguera, A., Ochoa-Ramos, A., Gomez-Sa´nchez, M.J., and Cruz- Adalia, A. (2021). Type 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells as Regulators of the Host-Pathogen Interaction. Front. Immunol. 12, 748851. 16. Zheng, Y., Valdez, P.A., Danilenko, D.M., Hu, Y., Sa, S.M., Gong, Q., Ab- bas, A.R., Modrusan, Z., Ghilardi, N., de Sauvage, F.J., and Ouyang, W. (2008). Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat. Med. 14, 282–289. 17. lique Jarade, A., Di Santo, J.P., and Serafini, N. (2021). Group 3 innate lymphoid cells mediate host defense against attaching and effacing path- ogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 63, 83–91. 18. Cella, M., Fuchs, A., Vermi, W., Facchetti, F., Otero, K., Lennerz, J.K.M., Doherty, J.M., Mills, J.C., and Colonna, M. (2009). A human natural killer cell subset provides an innate source of IL-22 for mucosal immunity. Na- ture 457, 722–725. 19. Castellanos, J.G., Woo, V., Viladomiu, M., Putzel, G., Lima, S., Diehl, G.E., Marderstein, A.R., Gandara, J., Perez, A.R., Withers, D.R., et al. (2018). Mi- crobiota-induced TNF-like ligand 1A drives group 3 innate lymphoid cell- mediated barrier protection and intestinal T cell activation during colitis. Immunity 49, 1077–1089.e5. 20. Lyu, M., Suzuki, H., Kang, L., Gaspal, F., Zhou, W., Goc, J., Zhou, L., Zhou, J., Zhang, W., et al.; JRI Live Cell Bank (2022). ILC3s select microbiota- specific regulatory T cells to establish tolerance in the gut. Nature 610, 744–751. 21. Kedmi, R., Najar, T.A., Mesa, K.R., Grayson, A., Kroehling, L., Hao, Y., Hao, S., Pokrovskii, M., Xu, M., Talbot, J., et al. (2022). A RORgt+ cell in- structs gut microbiota-specific Treg cell differentiation. Nature 610, 737–743. 22. Akagbosu, B., Tayyebi, Z., Shibu, G., Paucar Iza, Y.A., Deep, D., Parisotto, Y.F., Fisher, L., Pasolli, H.A., Thevin, V., Elmentaite, R., et al. (2022). Novel antigen-presenting cell imparts Treg-dependent tolerance to gut micro- biota. Nature 610, 752–760. 23. Yamano, T., Dobes, J., Voboril, M., Steinert, M., Brabec, T., Zie˛tara, N., Dobesova´, M., Ohnmacht, C., Laan,M., Peterson, P., et al. (2019). Aire-ex- pressing ILC3-like cells in the lymph node display potent APC features. J. Exp. Med. 216, 1027–1037. 24. Sonnenberg, G.F., and Artis, D. (2015). Innate lymphoid cells in the initia- tion, regulation and resolution of inflammation. Nat. Med. 21, 698–708. 25. Castellanos, J.G., and Longman, R.S. (2020). Innate lymphoid cells link gut microbes with mucosal T cell immunity. Gut Microb. 11, 231–236. 26. Mun˜oz, M., Eidenschenk, C., Ota, N., Wong, K., Lohmann, U., K€uhl, A.A., Wang, X., Manzanillo, P., Li, Y., Rutz, S., et al. (2015). Interleukin-22 In- duces Interleukin-18 Expression from Epithelial Cells during Intestinal Infection. Immunity 42, 321–331. 27. Fachi, J.L., Pral, L.P., dos Santos, J.A.C., Codo, A.C., de Oliveira, S., Fe- lipe, J.S., Zambom, F.F.F., Ca^mara, N.O.S., Vieira, P.M.M.M., Colonna, M., and Vinolo, M.A.R. (2021). Hypoxia enhances ILC3 responses through HIF-1a-dependent mechanism. Mucosal Immunol. 14, 828–841. 28. Palazon, A., Goldrath, A.W., Nizet, V., and Johnson, R.S. (2014). HIF tran- scription factors, inflammation, and immunity. Immunity 41, 518–528. 29. Glover, L.E., and Colgan, S.P. (2011). Hypoxia and metabolic factors that influence inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 140, 1748–1755. 30. Honda, K. (2012). IL-22 from T Cells: Better Late than Never. Immunity 37, 952–954. 31. Khan, M.A., Ma, C., Knodler, L.A., Valdez, Y., Rosenberger, C.M., Deng, W., Finlay, B.B., and Vallance, B.A. (2006). Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contrib- utes to Colitis Development but Not to Host Defense during Citrobacter ro- dentium Infection in Mice. Infect. Immun. 74, 2522–2536. 32. Gibson, D.L., Ma, C., Rosenberger, C.M., Bergstrom, K.S.B., Valdez, Y., Huang, J.T., Khan, M.A., and Vallance, B.A. (2008). Toll-like receptor 2 plays a critical role in maintaining mucosal integrity during Citrobacter ro- dentium-induced colitis. Cell Microbiol. 10, 388–403. Article ll OPEN ACCESS33. Crellin, N.K., Trifari, S., Kaplan, C.D., Satoh-Takayama, N., Di Santo, J.P., and Spits, H. (2010). Regulation of Cytokine Secretion in Human CD127+ LTi-like Innate Lymphoid Cells by Toll-like Receptor 2. Immunity 33, 752–764. 34. Teufel, C., Horvath, E., Peter, A., Ercan, C., Piscuoglio, S., Hall, M.N., Finke, D., and Lehmann, F.M. (2021). mTOR signaling mediates ILC3- driven immunopathology. Mucosal Immunol. 14, 1323–1334. 35. Di Luccia, B., Gilfillan, S., Cella, M., Colonna, M., and Huang, S.C.C. (2019). ILC3s integrate glycolysis andmitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species to fulfill activation demands. J. Exp.Med. 216, 2231–2241. 36. Abt, M.C., Lewis, B.B., Caballero, S., Xiong, H., Carter, R.A., Susac, B., Ling, L., Leiner, I., and Pamer, E.G. (2015). Innate immune defenses medi- ated by two ilc subsets are critical for protection against acute clostridium difficile infection. Cell Host Microbe 18, 27–37. 37. Chen, Y.S., Chen, I.B., Pham, G., Shao, T.Y., Bangar, H., Way, S.S., and Haslam, D.B. (2020). IL-17–producing gd T cells protect against Clos- tridium difficile infection. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2377–2390. 38. Krzywinska, E., Sobecki, M., Nagarajan, S., Zacharjasz, J., Tambuwala, M.M., Pelletier, A., Cummins, E., Gotthardt, D., Fandrey, J., Kerdiles, Y.M., et al. (2022). The transcription factor HIF-1a mediates plasticity of NKp46+ innate lymphoid cells in the gut. J. Exp. Med. 219, e20210909. 39. Seillet, C., Luong, K., Tellier, J., Jacquelot, N., Shen, R.D., Hickey, P., Wimmer, V.C., Whitehead, L., Rogers, K., Smyth, G.K., et al. (2020). The neuropeptide VIP confers anticipatory mucosal immunity by regulating ILC3 activity. Nat. Immunol. 21, 168–177. 40. Talbot, J., Hahn, P., Kroehling, L., Nguyen, H., Li, D., and Littman, D.R. (2020). Feeding-dependent VIP neuron–ILC3 circuit regulates the intesti- nal barrier. Nature 579, 575–580. 41. Pascal, M., Kazakov, A., Chevalier, G., Dubrule, L., Deyrat, J., Dupin, A., Saha, S., Jagot, F., Sailor, K., Dulauroy, S., et al. (2022). The neuropeptide VIP potentiates intestinal innate type 2 and type 3 immunity in response to feeding. Mucosal Immunol. 15, 629–641. 42. Yu, H.B., Yang, H., Allaire, J.M., Ma, C., Graef, F.A., Mortha, A., Liang, Q., Bosman, E.S., Reid, G.S., Waschek, J.A., et al. (2021). Vasoactive intesti- nal peptide promotes host defense against enteric pathogens by modu- lating the recruitment of group 3 innate lymphoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, e2106634118. 43. Ibiza, S., Garcı´a-Cassani, B., Ribeiro, H., Carvalho, T., Almeida, L., Mar- ques, R., Misic, A.M., Bartow-McKenney, C., Larson, D.M., Pavan, W.J., et al. (2016). Glial-cell-derived neuroregulators control type 3 innate lymphoid cells and gut defence IL-22. Nature 535, 440–443. 44. Bando, J.K., Gilfillan, S., Song, C., McDonald, K.G., Huang, S.C.C., New- berry, R.D., Kobayashi, Y., Allan, D.S.J., Carlyle, J.R., Cella, M., and Co- lonna, M. (2018). The Tumor Necrosis Factor Superfamily Member RANKL Suppresses Effector Cytokine Production in Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells Graphical Abstract Highlights d CCR6 + ILC3s from Rorc Cre Tnfsf11 fl/fl mice have enhanced IL-17A and IL-22 production d Loss of Tnfsf11 in ILC3s, and not T cells, leads to hyperresponsive CCR6 + ILC3s d RANKL directly suppresses ILC3s via RANK, and RANK deficiency enhances ILC3 activity d CCR6 + ILC3s lacking RANKL have increased amounts of RORgt. Immunity 48, 1208–1219.e4. 45. Kim, J., Shao, Y., Kim, S.Y., Kim, S., Song, H.K., Jeon, J.H., Suh, H.W., Chung, J.W., Yoon, S.R., Kim, Y.S., and Choi, I. (2008). Hypoxia-induced IL-18 Increases Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1 Expression through a Rac1- dependent NF-B Pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 433–444.46. Budda, S.A., Girton, A., Henderson, J.G., and Zenewicz, L.A. (2016). Tran- scription Factor HIF-1aControls Expression of the Cytokine IL-22 in CD4 T Cells. J. Immunol. 197, 2646–2652. 47. Frede, S., Stockmann, C., Freitag, P., and Fandrey, J. (2006). Bacterial lipopolysaccharide induces HIF-1 activation in human monocytes via p44/42 MAPK and NF-kB. Biochem. J. 396, 517–527. 48. Couturier-Maillard, A., Froux, N., Piotet-Morin, J., Michaudel, C., Brault, L., Le Be´richel, J., Se´ne´chal, A., Robinet, P., Chenuet, P., Jejou, S., et al. (2018). Interleukin-22-deficiency and microbiota contribute to the exacerbation of Toxoplasma gondii-induced intestinal inflammation article. Mucosal Immunol. 11, 1181–1190. 49. Victor, A.R., Nalin, A.P., Dong,W., McClory, S., Wei, M., Mao, C., Kladney, R.D., Youssef, Y., Chan, W.K., Briercheck, E.L., et al. (2017). IL-18 Drives ILC3 Proliferation and Promotes IL-22 Production via NF-kB. J. Immunol. 199, 2333–2342. 50. Ji, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Gamah, M., Yuan, Z., Liu, J., Cao, C., Gao, X., Zhang, H., Ren, Y., and Zhang, W. (2020). Effects of hypoxic exposure on immune responses of intestinal mucosa to Citrobacter colitis in mice. Bio- med. Pharmacother. 129, 110477. 51. Burguen˜o, J.F., and Abreu, M.T. (2020). Epithelial Toll-like receptors and their role in gut homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepa- tol. 17, 263–278. 52. Fukata, M., and Arditi, M. (2013). The role of pattern recognition receptors in intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 6, 451–463. 53. Re, F., and Strominger, J.L. (2001). Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 Differentially Activate Human Dendritic Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 37692– 37699. 54. Liu, Z., Zaki, M.H., Vogel, P., Gurung, P., Finlay, B.B., Deng, W., Lamkanfi, M., and Kanneganti, T.D. (2012). Role of Inflammasomes in Host Defense against Citrobacter rodentium Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 16955–16964. 55. Lei-Leston, A.C., Murphy, A.G., and Maloy, K.J. (2017). Epithelial cell in- flammasomes in intestinal immunity and inflammation. Front. Immunol. 8, 1168. 56. Tumanov, A.V., Koroleva, E.P., Guo, X., Wang, Y., Kruglov, A., Nedospa- sov, S., and Fu, Y.-X. (2011). Lymphotoxin Controls the IL-22 Protection Pathway in Gut Innate Lymphoid Cells during Mucosal Pathogen Chal- lenge. Cell Host Microbe 10, 44–53. 57. Wang, Y., Koroleva, E.P., Kruglov, A.A., Kuprash, D.v., Nedospasov, S.A., Fu, Y.-X., and Tumanov, A.v. (2010). Lymphotoxin Beta Receptor Signaling in Intestinal Epithelial Cells Orchestrates Innate Immune Re- sponses against Mucosal Bacterial Infection. Immunity 32, 403–413. 58. Rankin, L.C., Girard-Madoux, M.J.H., Seillet, C., Mielke, L.A., Kerdiles, Y., Fenis, A., Wieduwild, E., Putoczki, T., Mondot, S., Lantz, O., et al. (2016). Complementarity and redundancy of IL-22-producing innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 17, 179–186. 59. Valle-Noguera, A., Go´mez-Sa´nchez, M.J., Girard-Madoux, M.J.H., and Cruz-Adalia, A. (2020). Optimized Protocol for Characterization of Mouse Gut Innate Lymphoid Cells. Front. Immunol. 11, 563414. 60. Wu, X., Vallance, B.A., Boyer, L., Bergstrom, K.S.B., Walker, J., Madsen, K., O’Kusky, J.R., Buchan, A.M., and Jacobson, K. (2008). Saccharo- myces boulardii ameliorates Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis through actions on bacterial virulence factors. Am. J. Physiol. Gastroint- est. Liver Physiol. 294, 295–306.Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 15 Article ll OPEN ACCESSSTAR+METHODSKEY RESOURCES TABLEREAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies CD45.2 PerCP-Cy 5.5 Mouse anti-mouse Clon:104 BD Biosciences RRID: AB_394528 CD127 Anti-Mouse PE Cy-5 Clone: A7R34 Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_468792 CD335 (Nkp46) Anti-mouse PE-Cyanine7 Clone: 2941.4 Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_2573442 CD4 anti-mouse FITC Clone: GK1.5 CD4 anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 700 TONBO biosciences Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB2621665 RRID: AB_493999 CD90.2 anti-mouse BV650 Clone: 53–2.1 BD Biosciences RRID: AB_2740170 KLRG1 Anti - Mouse APC-eFLUOR 780 Clon: 2F1 Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_2573988 CD3 Anti-mouse APC/Cyanine7 Clone: 17A2 Isotype: Rat IgG2b CD3 Anti-mouse PE-Cyanine 5 Clone: 145-2C11 Biolegend TONBO biosciences RRID: AB_2242784 RRID: AB_2621815 CD19 Anti-mouse FITC Clone: 1D3 TONBO biosciences RRID: AB_2621682 CD5 anti-mouse BV421 Clone: 53–7.3 Biolegend RRID: AB_2562173 CCR6 anti-mouse APC Clone:29-2L17 Biolegend RRID: AB_1877147 CXCR6 Anti-mouse PE/Cyanine7 Clone: SA051D1 Biolegend RRID: AB_2721670 Ly-6G and Ly-6C (GR-1) Rat anti-mouse BV421 Clone: RB6-8C5 BD Biosciences RRID: AB_2737736 F4/80 Rat anti-mouse BV421 Clone: T45-2342 BD Biosciences RRID: AB_2734779 GATA-3 Alexa Fluor 488 Mouse Clone: L50-823 GATA-3 Mouse BV421 Clone: L50-823 BD Biosciences BD Biosciences RRID: AB_1645302 RRID: AB_2738152 RORgt Mouse/Anti-Mouse BV421 RORgt Anti-Hu/Mo PE BD Biosciences Invitrogen RRID: AB_2687545 RRID: AB_1834470 EOMES Anti-Mouse PE-eFluor 610 Clone: Dan11mag Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_2574613 CD16/CD32 (Fc block) Clone. 2.4G2 BD Biosciences RRID: AB_394656 IL-22 anti-mouse PE Clone: 1H8PWSR Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_10597428 IL7R anti-mouse/rat PE/Cyanine5 Clone: A7R34 Biolegend RRID: AB_1937261 IL-17A Anti- Mouse/Rat APC Clone: eBio17B7 Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_763580 TCRb anti-mouse BV421 Clone: H57-597 Biolegend RRID: AB_10933263 TCRgd anti-mouse BV421 Clone: GL3 Biolegend RRID: AB_10896753 Rat IgG2a Isotype control Clone: 2A3 BioXcell RRID: AB_1107769 Mouse anti-GFP Roche Applied Science. Sigma-Aldrich RRID:AB_390913 Goat anti-Mouse Alexa 488 Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_2534088 CD3 Monoclonal Antibody (17A2) Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_467053 CD3 antibody Abcam RRID: AB_305055 B220 anti-mouse Clone: RA3-6B2 StemCell 100–0422 Goat anti-Rat Alexa 647 Thermo Fisher Scientific RRID: AB_141778 Goat anti-rabbit Cy3 Jackson ImmunoResearch RRID: AB_2338009 Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins Recombinant mouse IL-23 protein (Sf21-derived) Lot DFXU0720061 > 95% purity R&D 1887-ML Recombinant mouse IL-1b protein 1 Stem Cell 78035.1 Recombinant mouse IL-18 protein 10ug (E-coli derived) R&D 9139–IL/CF Recombinant mouse TL1A protein Recombinant Mouse TNFSF15 (carrier-free) 10ug Biolegend 753002 Pam3CSK4 1mg TOCRIS 4633/1 (Continued on next page) 16 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 Continued REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia Coli O111:B4 (LPS) Sigma-Aldrich L2630 Brefeldin A Cell signaling 9972S Stop Golgi BD Biosciences 554724 BlockAidTM Blocking Solution Life technologies B10710 ProLong mounting medium ThermoFisher Scientific P36984 MacConkey agar Oxoid CM007B Sodium thiosulfate Sigma Aldrich 1.065.122.500 Ammonium citrate Sigma Aldrich RES20400-A7 TRIzol Sigma Aldrich T9424 PCR Power SYBR Green Applied Biosystems 4367659 DAPI Sigma Aldrich 32670 EvaGreen qPCR Mix Plus ROX Solis Biodyne 08-24-0000S Critical commercial assays Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set Thermo Fisher Scientific 00-5523-00 ELISA IL-18 Mouse Uncoated kit Thermo Fisher Scientific 88-50618-88 ELISA IL-22 10 3 96 Tests Thermo Fisher Scientific 88-7422-88 ELISA IL-17 Mouse Uncoated kit Thermo Fisher Scientific 88-8711-88 RNeasy Micro Kit Qiagen 74004 MojoSortTM Mouse CD4 T cell Isolation Kit Biolegend 480033 Experimental models: Organisms/strains B6-SJL (Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ) expressing CD45.1 allele Jackson Laboratory #:002014 RRID:IMSR_JAX:002014 B6.129-Hif1atm3Rsjo/J (HIF1aflox) Aragones J’s laboratory- from Jackson Laboratory #:007561 RRID:IMSR_JAX:007561 HIF-1afl/fl Ub-Cre ERT2 Aragones J’s laboratory B6.Cg-Ndor1Tg(UBCcre/ERT2)1Ejb/1J (WT Ub-Cre ERT2) Aragones J’s laboratory- from Jackson Laboratory #:007561 RRID:IMSR_JAX:007001 B6.FVB-Tg(Rorc-cre)1Litt/J (RORgtCre mice) Jackson Laboratory #:022791 RRID:IMSR_JAX:022791 B6.129P2(Cg)-Rorctm2Litt/J (RORgt EGFP mice) Jackson Laboratory #:007572 RRID:IMSR_JAX:007572 HIF-1afl/fl RORgtCre (HIF-1a6Rorc) This paper N/A B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J (RAG1KO) Veiga E’s laboratory from Jackson Laboratory #:002216 RRID:IMSR_JAX:002216 RAG1KO HIF-1afl/fl RORgtCre (RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc) This paper N/A HIF-1afl/fl RORgtCre EGFP (HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/) This paper N/A Software and algorithms CytExpert software Beckham Coulter RRID:SCR_017217 Flowjo software BD Biosciences RRID:SCR_008520 GraphPad Prism software Dotmatics RRID:SCR_002798 OMIQ software Dotmatics N/A Biorender software Biorender RRID:SCR_018361 Fiji Open Source RRID: SCR_002285 Article ll OPEN ACCESSRESOURCE AVAILABILITY Lead contact Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to, andwill be addressed by, the LeadContact, Cruz- Adalia A (arancruz@ucm.es).Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 17 Article ll OPEN ACCESSMaterials availability The mouse lines generated in the present study will be made available on request by the Lead Contact without restriction. Data and code availability d All original data reported in this paper are available from the lead contact upon request. d This paper does not report original code. d Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request. EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS Mice HIF-1afl/flRORgtCre (HIF-1a6Rorc) mice were generated by crossing B6.129-Hif1atm3Rsjo/J mice with B6.Cg-Ndor1Tg(UBC-cre/ ERT2)1Ejb/1J mice. The Rorcgfp/+ mice9 were crossed with HIF-1a6Rorc to generate the HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/ mice. RAG1KO mice were crossed with HIF-1a6Rorc mice to generate the RAG1KO HIF-1a6Rorc mice. The Hif-1afloxed-UBC-Cre-ERT2 mice were generated by crossing B6.129-Hif1atm3Rsjo/J mice with B6.Cg-Ndor1Tg(UBC-cre/ERT2)1Ejb/1J mice, which harbor two loxP sites flanking exon 2 of the murine Hif-1a and B6.Tg (UBC-Cre/ERT2) mice, which ubiquitously express a tamoxifen-inducible CRE recombinase (Cre-ERT2). The Hif-1afloxed-UBC-Cre-ERT2mice were kindly provided by our collaborator Dr. Julia´n Aragone´s (UAM). For Hif-1a gene inactivation, the mice were given ad libitum access to Teklad CRD TAM400/CreER tamoxifen pellets (The Harlan Laboratory) for 10–15 days or an intraperitoneal injection of 100 mL (20 mg/mL) tamoxifen for 5 days followed by standard mouse chow diet. Animals were distributed by age, sex, and weight. Females and males were used interchangeably, but within the in vivo infection experimental groups, individuals of the same sex were consistently grouped for comparison. All mice are of the C57BL/6 strain and were bred and housed in a climate-controlled environment at the CNB and CIB in accordance with the sanitary recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the CNB, CIB, and the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) and by the regional authorities (project nº PROEX 146/18 and PROEX 143.6/20). BM chimeras BMWT Cre or HIF-1a KO Cre chimeras were generated by transplanting with 53 106 BM cells from the WT Ub-Cre ERT2 CD45.2 or the HIF-1afl/fl Ub-Cre ERT2 CD45.2 mice, respectively, into lethally g-irradiated (2 doses of 6 Gy) WT C57/BL6 CD45.1 mice. Mixed BM chimeras were generated by injecting a mixture of 53106 BM cells from the RAG1KO and WT Ub-Cre ERT2 or the RAG1KO and HIF-1afl/fl Ub-Cre ERT2 mice in a proportion of 1:1 respectively, into lethally irradiated WT C57/BL6 CD45.1 mice. After 4 weeks, the reconstituted mice were subsequently treated with tamoxifen. BM WT Cre and HIF-1afl/fl KO mice mRNA was isolated from periph- eral blood to verify the expression of HIF-1a by qPCR. Furthermore, CD4+ T cells from the spleen of the mixed BM chimeras WT Ub- Cre:RAG1KO andHIF-1afl/fl KO: RAG1KOmice isolated bymouseCD4+ T cell isolation kit were processed to check the expression of HIF-1a by qPCR. Mixed BM chimeras were generated by injecting a mixture of 103106 BM cells from the CD45.2 HIF-1a6Rorc and CD45.1 control mice in a proportion of 1:1, into lethally irradiated WT C57/BL6 mice. After 5–6 weeks, the proportion of CD45.1+ and CD45.2+ was analyzed in blood to decide whether to proceed to infect with C. rodentium. Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis To induce colitis with C. rodentium, mice aged 8–12 weeks were orally gavaged with 1 3 1010 CFU/mL C. rodentium strain kindly provided by Dr. Eric Vivier. Survival, body weight, CFUs counts, and tissue histology were assessed as previously described.56,57 Analysis of CFUs was determined via serial dilutions on MacConkey agar plates supplemented with 0.68% sodium thiosulfate and 0.08% ammonium citrate from mechanically homogenized fecal pellets on days 2, 5 and 12 after C. rodentium infection.58 We performed colon explants and collected a piece of the distal colon to quantify cytokines by ELISA and qRT-PCR respectively on day 12 of the infection. LPCs were isolated for cell sorting, flow cytometry analysis or for being cultured 4 h with brefeldin A to analyze intracellular cytokines. METHOD DETAILS Counting of colonic patches Colons from infected or uninfected mice were collected, washed, and opened longitudinally. Afterward, they were incubated by shaking in phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS) containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 5 mM EDTA, and 14 mM HEPES at 37C for 30 min. After washing with PBS, CLPs were counted by backlighting. Isolation of colonic LPCs The intestinal lamina propria cells were isolated as described by.59 In short, mouse colons were removed and cut longitudinally and transversally into 1.5 cm pieces, which were incubated by shaking in PBS containing 10% FBS, 5 mM EDTA, and 14 mM HEPES at 37C for 30min. Then, the tissueswere thendigested inRPMI1640containing10%FBS, 25mMHEPES, and300UI/mLof collagenase18 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 Article ll OPEN ACCESStype VII at 37C for 45 min. The digested tissues were homogenized by passing through 70 mm cell strainers. Mononuclear cells were then harvested from the interphase of a 70% and 40% Percoll gradient after spinning at 2,100 rpm for 20 min at room temperature. Flow cytometry, antibodies, and ELISA ILC staining was performed as previously described by.59 Antibodies against CD45.2, CD3, CD19, Gr-1, F4/80, CD90.2, GATA-3, CD16/CD32, CD127, NKp46, KLRG1, CD4, RORgt, Eomes, IL-17, IL-22, IL-7R, CXCR6, CD5, TCRb, TCRgd, CCR6, RORgt and IL-17 were used. For cytokine production, cells were stimulated ex vivo by IL-23 (40 ng/mL), IL-1b (100 ng/mL), and Brefeldin A (5 mg/mL) or Stop Golgi (1:1500) for 4 h. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with eBioscience Foxp3/ Factor Staining Buffer Set following the manufacturer’s guidelines. For induction of IL-22 through IL-18 stimulation, LPCs were culti- vated overnight with or without IL-23 (40 ng/mL) and/or IL-18 (100 ng/mL) followed by 4 h of ex vivo Stop Golgi stimulation (1:1500). Flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting were performed on FACSCAria (BD Biosciences), Cytoflex (Beckham Coulter) and Cytek Aurora instruments and analyzed with FlowJo, CytExpert or OMIQ softwares. IL-22, IL-17, and IL-18 in supernatants collected at 0, 3, 5, 7, and/or 12 days after infection were measured by ELISA according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Flow cytometry gating strategy Th22/Th17 gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage (F4/80, CD19, Gr-1), CD3+, CD4+, RORgt+. ILC1 gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, LiveDead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, RORgt-, Nkp46+, CD127+, Eomes-.NKcells gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, RORgt-, Nkp46+, CD127-, Eomes+. ILC2s gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, RORgt-, Nkp46-, KLRG1+, GATA-3+. ILC3s Nkp46+ gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, CD4, RORgt+, CD90+, IL7R+, CXCR6+, Nkp46+. ILC3s Nkp46-/Lti gating strategy: FSC, SSC; sin- glets, LiveDead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, CD4, RORgt+, CD90+, IL7R+,CXCR6+Nkp46-. Lti CD4+ cells gating strategy: FSC,SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, RORgt+, CD90+, IL7R+, CXCR6+, Nkp46-, CD4+. Lti cells gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, RORgt+, Nkp46-, CCR6+. Non-ILC3 Innate RORgt cells gating strategy: FSC, SSC; singlets, Live Dead, CD45+, Linage, CD3, CD4, RORgt+, CD90, IL7R-, CXCR6-. Ex vivo organ culture Colon tissue was harvested from mice, opened longitudinally, and washed in PBS twice. Two biopsy punches (4 mm, Kai medical) from the distal colon were cultured in 400 mL of complete medium (RPMI supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL strep- tomycin and 10% FBS) for 24 or 48 h at 37C. Colons were stimulated with Pam3CSK4 (0.2 mg/mL) + IL-2 (10 U/mL), LPS (1 mm/ML), IL-1b (10 ng/mL), IL-23 (40 ng/mL), TL1A (200 ng/mL), IL-18 (100 ng/mL) and the BP IL-18 (1 mg/mL). Isolation of splenic ILC3s Single-cell suspensions were prepared with spleens from the KO HIF-1a6Rorc EGFP+/ and the WT EGFP+/ control mice. Splenic cells were then stainedwith CD45.2, CD3, CD19, F4/80, andGr-1. The ILC3s population was also isolated according to its expression of EGFP. Sorted ILC3s were incubated in vitro with or without 40 ng/mL IL-23 and/or 100 ng/mL IL-18. Histology Colons were cleaned and cut in their distal part. Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for wax embedding. Cross sections of the colon (5 mm) were cut, mounted on slides and routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Colitis severity was assessed by researchers blinded to sample identity with criteria adapted from X. Wu et al. 2007.60 This assessment involved a combined score of immune cell infiltration and epithelial damage (crypt loss, hyperproliferation and ulcers). Each param- eter graded 0-3 adding on a total score of 12. Immunofluorescence Colonic tissues were cut longitudinally, cleaned in PBS and formed into a ‘Swiss roll’ and embedded in OCT. Tissues were frozen and stored at 80C, before being sliced into 5-mm-thick sections with a cryostat and fixed in PFA 4% for 20 min. Afterward, tissue sections were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.05% BSA and 0.2% saponin (PBS-Staining buffer) for 30 min at room temper- ature. After blocking them with PBS-Staining buffer, mice serum (1/100), and Fc block (1/200) for 30 min at 37C, they were rinsed in PBS and treated with Blockaid for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, slides were incubated with anti-EGFP (1/50), anti-CD3 (1/100), and anti-B220 (1/100) for 1 h at 37C, diluted in the PBS-Staining buffer. After rinsing with PBS, they were stained with goat anti-mouse 488 (1/500), goat anti-rabbit Cy3, and goat anti-rat Ig Alexa 647 in PBS-Staining buffer for 1h 30min at room temperature. Finally, tissue sections were stained with DAPI (1/500) in PBS-Staining buffer for 30min at 37C, washed in PBS1X andmounted with ProLong mounting medium. Images were acquired on a Confocal multispectral Leica TCS SP8 system microscope and Confocal multispectral system Leica STELLARIS 5. RNA isolation and qPCR Colonic RNA was purified with TRIzol and reverse transcribed into cDNA. qPCR was performed with QuantStudio 5 Real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems) with PCR Power SYBR Green or MasterMix qPCR ROX PyroTaq EvaGreen in triplicates. Samples wereCell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023 19 Article ll OPEN ACCESSnormalized to the expression of gene encoding 18S. Primers for Hif-1a, Il-22, Il-18, Slc2a1, Il-17, Il-1b, Il-23p19, Tnf-a, and 18S (Table S1) were employed. RNA from sorted splenic ILC3s, cultured with or without 40 ng/mL IL-23 and/or 100 ng/mL IL-18 for 6 h, or from colonic ILC3s of infected mice, was extracted with a RNeasy Micro Kit and was reversely transcribed to cDNA. The qPCR of the genes IL-22, Il-17, Slc2a1 andHif-1awas performed in ‘‘Parque tecnolo´gico deMadrid’’, using SYBRGreen Supermix. Samples were normalized to the expression of gene encoding 18S. QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software. To determine significant differences (*p < 0.05) parametric data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and 1-way ANOVA followed by Sidak multiple comparisons test, or paired or unpaired Student t-test. For histoscore, 2-tailed Mann– Whitney U test was used. For survival curves, statistics were calculated with the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test.20 Cell Reports 42, 113508, December 26, 2023