Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este Item:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/8877
Título
Survival impact of primary tumor resection in de novo metastatic breast cancer patients (GEICAM/El Alamo Registry)
Autor(es)
Lopez-Tarruella, Sara | Escudero, M J | Pollan-Santamaria, Marina ISCIII | Martín, Miguel | Jara, Carlos | Bermejo, Begoña | Guerrero-Zotano, Angel | García-Saenz, José | Santaballa, Ana | Alba, Emilio | Andrés, Raquel | Martínez, Purificación | Calvo, Lourdes | Fernández, Antonio | Batista, Norberto | Llombart-Cussac, Antonio | Antón, Antonio | Lahuerta, Ainhara | de la Haba, Juan | López-Vega, José Manuel | Carrasco, E
Fecha de publicación
2019-12-27
Cita
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20081.
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo de documento
journal article
Resumen
The debate about surgical resection of primary tumor (PT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients persists. We explored this approach's outcomes in patients included in a retrospective registry, named El Álamo, of breast cancer patients diagnosed in Spain (1990-2001). In this analysis we only included de novo MBC patients, 1415 of whom met the study's criteria. Descriptive, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out. Median age was 63.1 years, 49.2% of patients had single-organ metastasis (skin/soft tissue [16.3%], bone [33.8%], or viscera [48.3%]). PT surgery (S) was performed in 44.5% of the cases. S-group patients were younger, had smaller tumors, higher prevalence of bone and oligometastatic disease, and lower prevalence of visceral involvement. With a median follow-up of 23.3 months, overall survival (OS) was 39.6 versus 22.4 months (HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001) in the S- and non-S groups, respectively. The S-group OS benefit remained statistically and clinically significant regardless of metastatic location, histological type, histological grade, hormone receptor status and tumor size. PT surgery (versus no surgery) was associated with an OS benefit suggesting that loco-regional PT control may be considered in selected MBC patients. Data from randomized controlled trials are of utmost importance to confirm these results.
Versión en línea
DOI
Aparece en las colecciones
- Investigación > IIS > IdISSC - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid)
- Investigación > IIS > INCLIVA - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia (C. Valenciana)
- Investigación > IIS > IiSGM - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (Madrid)
- Investigación > IIS > IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND - Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (Andalucía)
- Investigación > ISCIII > Centro Nacional de Epidemiología (CNE) > ISCIII - Artículos
Acceso a texto completo